Home
Page
Geoff Kelly Wine Reviews
independent
analytical
non-commercial
Independent reviews of some local and imported wines available in New Zealand, including earlier vintages.
1977 AND 1963 VINTAGE PORTS,  TWO OTHERS …



Geoff Kelly  MSc (Hons)




Moreso than usual,  in this tasting the group view of the best wines differed from mine:  this article is a personal account,   therefore.  The group view is indicated in the wine descriptions.  From the left,  my top six wines:  1977 Graham's,  richer,  sweeter and riper than the others,  but fewer subtleties (two half-bottles),  18.5 +;  1977 Taylor's,  supremely subtle and delicate,  reminders of Pauillac,  19 +;  1963 Fonseca's,  wonderful bouquet,  not quite the total harmony of the 1963 Dow's on palate,  19 +;  1977 Dow's,  piquant,  spicy,  complex,  approaching maturity,  19 +;  1977 Fonseca's,  nearly as big as the Grahams's,  but with extraordinary piquancy,  complexity,  richness and length,  still a young wine,  19.5;  1963 Dow's,  not quite as powerful as the 1977 Fonseca,  but an understated complexity,  harmony,  flavour and length,  combined with a silky finish,  made tasting this wine an absolutely benchmark experience,  19.5.  These six wines,  plus the 1975 Delaforce,  illustrated just why vintage port holds such a special place in the hearts of keen wine-people.

Conclusions from the the Tasting:
This Library Tasting (at Regional Wines & Spirits,  Wellington) produced a most unusual anticipatory delight among participants,  which seemed to intensify as the wines were actually tasted – a joy to experience.  Few had ever tasted 1963 vintage port before.  As discussion emerged during the evening,  the fact became apparent that indeed,  for most people,  it is rare to even have two vintage port wines open alongside each other,  for evaluation.

Settling down into the wines,  the first impression was of how beautiful the colours were,  nearly all them limpid and glowing,  ruby and garnet,  variously mature / old pinot noir colour in weight.  Surprisingly,  it was not at all apparent which were the two 1963 wines.  And then when you started to smell them,  the sheer exhilaration in several of the bouquets,  so wonderfully fresh,  lifted (with the higher alcohol of the port wine-style) and enticing / almost aromatic,  saliva-inducing,  all added to the pleasure.  With the youngest of the wines 41 years old,  and the oldest 55,  simple berry and fruit analogies seemed woefully inadequate:  for the best of them,  here was the magic,  the alchemy,  of age,  given exceptional fruit and good winemaking to start with.

Even the least of the Portuguese wines,  the 1975,  which Broadbent is almost dismissive of,  provided a surprisingly fragrant,  balanced and harmonious introduction to the set of 10.  On its own,  it would give much pleasure.  But yes,  as soon as you tasted any 1977 alongside it,  the latter were much richer indeed.  And at the other extreme,  the idea of adding an Australian vintage port style of comparable age to the blind tasting proved ill-conceived.  

As to preparations for the tasting,  if these wines are to be presented in optimal condition,  bright and clear,  they must be stood-up several weeks before the tasting,  to allow the flakey tissue-like deposits to pack down.  Extracting the corks without stirring up the deposits is a fraught process.  The volume of crusted / condensed material in some bottles was staggering – a full egg-cup in one.  And not just fines:  lumps and aggregations so big the bottle had to be shaken / jolted (for one),  to get them out.  The richness / sugar-free dry extract of the better vintage port wines at bottling must be off-the-scale.

The Invitation (expanded):
In preparing the notes for this tasting,  we have to bear in mind transatlantic differences in the approach to wine.  As with red wines,  the American taste in vintage port tends to the larger,  riper,  and sweeter.  Which years constitute ‘classic’ vintage port years will therefore differ,  either side of the Atlantic.  I have preferred to use the European approach.  I have therefore made extensive use of the information on the website of The Vintage Port Shop,   Fordingbridge,  Hampshire.  They achieve a standard of excellence we can only dream about,  and envy,  in New Zealand.  All their sales staff have WSET qualifications.  The shop maintains a cellar stock of over 10,000 bottles of port.  Their website has at least a little information for every single port vintage from 1912 to the present day.

For 1977 The Vintage Port Shop rates the year a five star vintage,  one of 12 only since 1900:  1917,  1927  1945,  1948,  1955,  1960,  1963,  1966,  1970,  1977,  1994,  2011.  They describe the wines thus:  The 1977 port vintage was a classic Port vintage that was declared by all the major port houses. Even after more than thirty years, the ports are only just becoming approachable. They will last for many more decades. The port wines are concentrated, complex, well structured and balanced. Marked by strong tannins, these wines have great finesse and staying power.  In 1992,  Richard Mayson (author of ‘Port and the Douro’) writing in Decanter described the 1977s as:  … quintessential Vintage Port … the best 1977s are as near to perfection as the most fastidious Port drinker will ever find.  Since then the view has grown that 1977 may fall fractionally short of the all-time great years such as 1963.

The Vintage Port Shop [ at the point of writing ] has 18 individual 1977 vintage ports in stock,  the prices ranging from £85 to £375.00 per bottle. Note we have their three most expensive in our tasting.

For 1963,  The Vintage Port Shop describes the vintage in these terms:  1963 vintage ports are the benchmark against which others are compared. The Vintage is considered to be legendary! The combination of a near-perfect growing season and temperate weather during the harvest made for a benchmark vintage. Nearly all the shippers produced supremely balanced well-structured wines ... 1963 vintage ports never fail to impress with their essential three components of fruit, tannin and elegance. [They] Almost always appear to be younger than they really are.  The Symington family (Dow,  Graham,  Warre etc) say of the 1963s:  a monumental vintage of legendary proportions that needs no introduction. One of the 20th Century’s finest. A vintage Port against which all others are judged.

The Vintage Port Shop has 22 individual 1963 vintage ports in stock,  with prices ranging from £130 to £325 for regular vintage ports,  and £4,900 for Quinta do Noval’s very rare Nacional.  Note they rate the two in our tasting as:  standing out amongst a uniformly excellent field.

The chances of being able to buy any 1963 or 1977 vintage (Portuguese) port in New Zealand are vanishingly rare.  The opportunity to taste six 1977 wines,  and two 1963,  including most of the famous names,  is therefore rare beyond description.

Seasons:
Both years come into the category of cold preceding winters and modest springs / early summers,  followed by marvellous Indian summers,  leading to small grapes and thick skins,  with good tannins and colour.   September 1977 was unusually warm.  Broadbent (2003) considers both years as in the ‘classic mould’.  He describes 1963 as:  a large quantity … of well-constituted, elegant wines *****;  and 1977 as:  Generally, these are fairly deep,  consistently good quality wines *****.  He notes that Martinez,  Noval and Cockburn did not declare the 1977s:  a decision they later regretted.

Wine-making:
Up till about 1990,  foot-treading of grapes was still commonplace.  Since then,  the scarcity and cost of labour has made the search for mechanised ways of crushing the grapes and extracting the essence of them more important.  However a number of houses still use foot-treading for the all-important (but only 1 – 2% of total port production) vintage ports.  Our 1977s are perhaps all foot-trodden wines,  the 1963s certainly so.  The reason is the enhanced gentleness of the foot approach,  with no breaking of pips and release of harsh tannins.  Once the fermenting wine has reached 6° – 7° Beaumé ( about 90 – 100 g/L sugar),  with about 6 – 8° of alcohol,   it is run off,  and blended with about 25%  by volume of 77° grape ‘brandy’ –  more accurately grape spirit.  The quality of the ‘brandy’ is critical to the finesse of the ultimate port.  The wines are kept in barrel for a relatively short period,  and must be bottled within 2 years of vintage.  Most are bottled after about 18 months,  with about 20% alcohol by volume.  Since 1973 all vintage port has been bottled in Portugal.  Sweetness levels vary,  but around 100 g/L is typical.

Blending:
As the premium wine of the district,  most Vintage Ports are blends from several vineyards (quintas).  Additionally,  some firms have specialised in producing individual vineyard wines,  particularly where one place has excelled in an otherwise non-vintage year.  Famous examples include Taylor’s Quinta de Vargellas,  Offley’s Boa Vista,  and Dow’s Quinta de Bomfim,  as well as Quinta do Noval Nacional.

Grapes:  
The whole approach to port is still very traditional.  Many ports are still made from ‘field blends’ of many varieties all grown together,  and with little or no regard to which,  even though they ripen at different times.  The Graham’s website records that 67 red varieties are officially permitted by the Instituto do Vinho do Porto e do Douro,  IVDP,  although in fact only a small proportion of them are widely cultivated.  Other websites mention 30 or so,  but in general there is not the New World interest in varietal character and cepage.  Virtually no information on the percentage varietal composition of the wines in our tasting is available.  One of the best introductions to the main varieties is on the Taylor’s website.  The five most-favoured / classic port varieties,  which the leading houses are increasingly planting in single-variety blocks to optimise picking at optimal ripeness,  are:
Touriga Nacional:  the premier vintage port grape,  but not the most widely-planted:  deeply coloured,  intensely flavoured,  low yields,  small berries,  very tannic and aromatic juice.  Provides body,  depth and intensity,  plus massive mouthfilling tannins.  Wines dominated by touriga nacional include Noval and Taylor,  and are long-lived.  The grape has some sensory similarities to cabernet sauvignon.
Touriga Franca = Touriga Francesa:  the most widely-planted variety,  reliable and well-regarded,  often the base for vintage ports.  Not the same as Tinta Francisca,  nor French.  Favoured for perfumed aroma,  intense fruit,  and full-bodied.  Sometimes floral.
Tinta Roriz:  the Tempranillo of Spain (= Aragonez),  the second most-planted,  thick skins,  high sugars,  low acidity,  succulent and fragrant,  finely-constituted,  a tendency to over-produce.  The good tannin structure promotes longevity,  and sometimes contributes resiny notes.
Tinto Cao:  the least-planted of the top five,  due to low yields,  but reliable and tolerant of very poor soils.     Produces light-coloured wines which with bottle age develop finesse,  complexity,  and spice.  Interest in this variety is increasing.
Tinta Barroca:  the third most-planted,  thick-skinned,  sweet (sometimes too sweet),  producing wines with good fruit and tannin,  long-lived.  Not quite as highly regarded,  by some.
Plus Sousao,  which several houses (eg Noval) favour over Tinta Barroca.

Ownership:
Aggregation of port houses continues.  There seems to have been no loss of individuality.
Symington Group,  British,  control Warre (since 1905),  Dow (since 1912),  Graham (since 1970),  plus Smith Woodhouse,  Gould Campbell,  Cockburn (since 2006) and others;
Robertson Group,  British,  control Taylor Fladgate,  Fonseca / Guimaraens (since 1948),  Croft and Delaforce (since 2001),  and Osborne;
Sogrape (Portugal) controls Ferreira,  Offley and Sandeman;
Caixa Nova (Spain) controls Calem,  Burmester,  Barros and Kopke;
Noval was until 1993 Portuguese,  but is now owned by the French group AXA;  and Quinta do Crasto is all Portuguese,  predominantly a red-wine company in the Douro.

References:
Broadbent,  Michael  2002:  Michael Broadbent's Vintage Wine.  Harcourt,  560 p.  
Broadbent,  Michael,  2003:   Michael Broadbent's Wine Vintages.  Mitchell Beazley,  London,  223 p. 
Evans,  Len 1978:   Complete Book of Australian Wine.  Hamlyn,  512 p. 
www.bbr.com = Berry Bros & Rudd,  leading London wine merchant
www.fortheloveofport.com = Roy Hersh:  For The Love Of Port
www.jancisrobinson.com = Jancis Robinson and Julia Harding (subscription needed) 
www.richardmayson.com = Richard Mayson:  Vintage Port Notes,  Madeira Wine Notes,  Portuguese Notes
www.robertparker.com = Robert Parker and Neal Martin mainly (subscription needed)   
www.vintageportshop.co.uk = The Vintage Port Shop,  Fordingbridge,  Hampshire,  UK
www.winespectator.com = various authors (subscription needed) 
www.winespectator.com/vintagecharts/search  = Vintage Charts 






THE WINES REVIEWED:

For most,  the prices shown below are the current wine-searcher international averaged values,  expressed in New Zealand dollars.  Where available,  the original purchase price is shown in the ‘admin’ section of the review.  As presented,  the wines were blind,  to obtain a group ranking.  Identification was revealed early,  so tasters could benefit from the recorded views of markedly more experienced tasters,  as summarised in the handout.  That information us now in the italicised ‘admin’ section for each wine,  the quotes in roman.


1977  Croft Vintage Port
1975  Delaforce Finest Vintage Port
1977   Dow’s Vintage Port
1963  Dow’s Vintage Port
1977  Fonseca’s Finest Vintage Port
  1963  Fonseca’s Finest Vintage Port
1977  Graham’s Vintage Port
1972  Stonyfell Metala Vintage Port
1977  Taylor’s Vintage Port
1977  Warre’s Vintage Port


1963  Dow’s Vintage Port   19 ½  ()
Douro,  Portugal:   – %;  $441   [ cork,  48mm;  cepage not known,  but usually 75% or so touriga nacional and touriga franca;  18 months in older oak (none new),  no fining or filtration;  considered to be drier than the other Symington group wines;  Broadbent has Dow as one of the top five wines of the vintage,  but notes in 2001 (after he had tasted it formally more than 43 times) that it was now fully to over-mature,  drying sometimes,  at best:  still sweet,  rich with marvellous flavour and length;  Robinson in 2006 has a different view,  noting that the 1963 is the finest Dow she has tasted,  and worth quoting in full (since she rarely scores at the 19.5 level):  Mid to pale ruby with a brick rim. Wonderfully mature, complex nose with dried fruits – prunes? – but freshness too. Hint of dark chocolate. Alcohol wonderfully integrated. Then on the palate a real dancer of a wine – perfectly lively and truly tonic on the palate. Real delicacy – not desperately sweet, just beautifully balanced. Very very clean finish with a definite whisper of tannin on the finish. The Syms reckons this would be one of the top four or five vintage ports of the 20th century by anyone’s reckoning and certainly it demonstrated to me exactly what I love about really mature, top quality vintage port – a world away from young ruby,  19.5;  Robert Parker,  1989:  The 1963 is a classic, a monumental, rich, still tannic wine that will last at least another 30 years, 92;  www.dows-port.com ]
Glowing garnet and ruby,  a little older than the 1963 Fonseca,  below midway in depth.  Bouquet is understated,  but even at this age nearly floral in a dusky way,  with currants and browning red plummy fruits,  plus some of the piquancy of orange oil and dried Otago apricots,  and a hint of marzipan,  all melded into the essence of mature vintage port.  Palate is wonderfully rich,  long,  and sustained,  with an integration of fruit and oak that stands out in the set,  not at all tanniny yet with a clear backbone and length,  finishing smoothly and in one sense almost ‘dry’.  It is not the richest or sweetest in the set,  but it is ‘complete’.  Robinson’s reported comments and assessment seemed perfectly appropriate.  Will hold for years.  Two tasters had the 1963 Dow’s as their top wine.  GK 05/18

1977  Fonseca’s Finest Vintage Port   19 ½  ()
Douro,  Portugal:  21%;  $410   [ cork,  48mm;  main grapes understood to be touriga franca and tinta roriz,  touriga nacional,  but no relative ratios found;  Parker,  1989:  Fonseca is one of the great port lodges, producing the most exotic and most complex port. If Fonseca lacks the sheer weight and power of a Taylor, Dow or Warre, or the opulent sweetness and intensity of a Graham, it excels in its magnificently complex, intense bouquet of plummy, cedary, spicy fruit and long, broad, expansive flavors. With its lush, seductive character, one might call it the Pomerol of Vintage ports. When it is young, it often loses out in blind tastings to the heavier, weightier, more tannic wines, but I always find myself upgrading my opinion of Fonseca after it has had 7-10 years of age. The 1977 has developed magnificently in the bottle, and while it clearly needs another decade to reach its summit, it is the best Fonseca since the 1970 and 1963, 93;  Simon Field MW,  of Berry Bros & Rudd:  When last tasted in November 2010, the Fonseca impressed with both its charm, about which we knew, but also its structural power, about which we may have been less sure. The 1977s Port wines were much lauded on release, but one or two questions were asked as to whether they would ... last the course in the manner of the greatest vintages. Tasting ... the Fonseca was therefore reassuring: the black fruits, cassis and morello, are still evidenced, the spirit has integrated nicely and there is gentle spice on the finish. Fonseca's famous elegance pervades, effortless and evanescent;  James Suckling @ Wine Spectator,  2008:  What a Vintage Port. Dark ruby center, with a dark garnet edge. Aromas of flowers, blackberry and licorice. Subtle and complex. Wow. What a palate. Full, concentrated and rich, yet balanced and beautiful. Solid and sleepy. Still not giving all it has to give. This is just coming around. Gorgeous and classy. Love it. Drink now, 100;  www.fonseca.pt ]
Glowing ruby and garnet,  a sensational colour for 41 years of age,  one of the two wines showing the most ‘red’ in the ruby,  above midway in depth.  Likewise the bouquet has a freshness and intensity to it which is remarkable,  red  fruits more than brown,  wonderfully piquant and exciting,  orange oil again,  red cherry,  red plum,  currants,  nougat and cedary oak lifted by alcohol,  and a particular spicy quality reminiscent of cinnamon and grenache.  In mouth the wine stands out for its concentration,  richness,  sweetness and length,  while remaining fresh and exhilarating,  chock-full of vintage port flavour,  with a very long fruit-filled aftertaste,  almost youthful.  This wine has a great cellar future ahead of it,  sensationally so given its 41 years of age.  Two tasters had this as their second-favourite wine.  GK 05/18

1963  Fonseca’s Finest Vintage Port   19 +  ()
Douro,  Portugal:   – %;  $623   [ cork,  52mm;  cepage understood to be mainly tinta roriz,  touriga franca,  touriga nacional;  Broadbent,  2002:  … a consistently beautiful wine. One of the top ‘63s, and one of the best-ever Fonsecas.  In 1998:  richly coloured, cinnamon and cress fragrance, still sweet, fairly assertive, tall, shapely, lissom, *****;  Roy Hersh,  2009:  1963 Fonseca Vintage Port – It does not get much better than this in the VP world. … heat which arrived in time for the harvest. Fortunately, the nights were considerably cooler and the levels of acidity increased with the extra hang time, along with deeply extracted colors and super-concentrated flavors. “Nearly perfect” was the verdict of the Port trade, at the time. This Fonseca Vintage Port ... offers a stunning nose of boysenberry and blueberry fruit, with violets ... on the palate ... great plum character of Fonseca comes to the fore along with smoky cherry and chocolate that combines for one sumptuous and tantalizing finish. Great body weight, yet it is so smooth that it feels like liquid butterscotch,  97;  Richard Mayson,  2016:  This is one of the greatest Ports of the twentieth century … lovely mature garnet hue; fine, fragrant and surging from the glass, floral with a touch of savoury cedar; still very fresh on the palate, fine, elegant almost delicate sweet summer berry fruit but all there, still beautifully structured yet gentle, elegant and so, so fresh all the way through to the finish. Long and very fine. Outstanding, 19.5;  Neal Martin @ R Parker,  2013:  ... a dark russet color. The nose is beautifully defined … walnut, small cherries, juniper berries and a touch of spirit that expands in the glass. The palate is medium-bodied with wonderful balance and fine tannins. It has tremendous weight matched by nigh perfect acidity. It is very harmonious, almost honeyed towards the finish with hazelnut and cloves infusing the decayed fruit and hints of menthol on the spicy aftertaste. This is a sublime Fonseca that will last another two or three decades with ease. Drink now-2030+, 96;  www.fonseca.pt ]
Glowing ruby and garnet,  a little fresher / redder than the 1963 Dow’s,  and (remarkably) only fractionally older than the 1977 Fonseca,  the third deepest (that is,  fractionally deeper than the 1977 Fonseca).  The bouquet shows an intensity and beauty of vintage port character which is a standout in the set,  yet it is so hard to find words to characterise it.  There are red fruits browning now,  currants (meaning grape currants),  glacé fig and maybe trace prune in the best sense of fresh moist prunes (not cooked),  a touch of marzipan,  great excitement and an enticing uplift.  Palate continues the bouquet,  long,  rich and sweet,  yet finishing a little more oaky / spirity / not quite with the sheer harmony of the understated 1963 Dow’s.  Again one can cellar this with confidence.  The total quality of this wine appealed to tasters,  seven first places,  three second.  GK 05/18

1977   Dow’s Vintage Port   19 +  ()
Douro,  Portugal:   – %;  $203   [ cork,  50mm;  main grapes touriga franca,  touriga nacional,  tinta barroca,  tinta roriz;  NB:  1977 Dow's Vintage Port has a reputation for many poor bottles,  with elevated VA.  We have to hope this bottle is a good one;  Rupert Symington,  2017,  speaking of the 1977 Dow at a tasting with Wine Spectator:  I would call ‘77 one of the last of the really old-style Vintage Ports –  farmers’ wines rather than négociant wines ... foot-trodden;  Broadbent,  1991:  Colour loss started mid-80s. The nose endlessly fascinating with sweet fig-like fruit, a squeeze of tangerine, cognac-like spirit, developing fragrance.  Consistently exciting flavour, medium sweet, fairly full-bodied, intense, assertive, the grip of a good vintage and a long lean dry finish. Maturity to well beyond 2020, *****;  Robinson,  2016:  Pale transparent ruby. High toned and subtle orange peel and great freshness. Some treacle and beautifully ready. Hint of roses. Spirit but not too much. Great stuff!, 18.5;  Hersh,  2011:  Medium cranberry red center and slight bricking on the edge. Intoxicating floral fragrance that filled the room, during its nine hour decant; accented by anise, plum and raspberry notes and a bit of spirit. Fresh, fleshy grape, dark cherry and fig flavors melded with underpinnings of licorice, chocolate and warming spirit. It's developing into a stunning middle-aged Port at 34 years of age, with little signs of nearing peak yet. Rich and multi-faceted, smooth and velvety ... even more so the second day it was opened. The acidity was near perfect and the tannins are tame but omnipresent; while the finish was spicy, warm and extremely long, 94;  www.dows-port.com ]
Glowing ruby and garnet,  one of the two reddest wines,  just above midway in depth.  In addition to the browning red fruits quality of the bouquet,  there is a piquant note reminding a little of orange oil and dried Otago apricots,  exciting,  attractive.  [ Otago dried apricots are intensely varietal,  very different from Turkish hot-climate fruits ].  This wine too showed some of the cinnamon / spicy qualities of fine grenache.  In mouth it is rich,  sweet,  concentrated and long,  though not quite matching the 1977 Fonseca.  Like the 1963 Dow,  there is already great harmony and length on the dry-ish finish,  and none of the cooked-prune notes some of the other wines show.  Four people rated this their top wine,  and two their second.  GK 05/18

1977  Taylor’s Vintage Port   19 +  ()
Douro,  Portugal:   – %;  $363   [ cork,  50mm;  original price $37.50;  the Taylor’s website lists the five ‘standard’ grapes in this order:  touriga nacional,  touriga francesa,  tinta roriz,  tinta barroca,  tinta cao,  though whether the order is significant in terms of cepage is not clear;  Taylor’s is often regarded as the longest-lived vintage port,  though not the richest or sweetest;  Robinson,  2016:  Light ruby, this wine ... looked pretty mature. Spicy, earthy nose. Jewelly, round texture indicated that the tannins had retreated well into the background. Gentle fruity core with red pepper notes and more spice on the fairly dry and notably fresh finish. I must admit that I thought it was older than a 1977, 18.5;  Roy Hersh, 2007,  recalling his top 12 vintage ports of the last 40 years:  Magenta color and showing no signs of nearly 30 years old in its appearance. Ahhh, this is what a fine Taylor '77 should deliver ... it is hard not to love this youthful VP. It took some coaxing and time to open up and showed a rich, full-bodied sumptuous Port. The structure is focused and the acidity and tannins are in perfect synch with the bold and brash berry fruit. Totally enjoyable right now and it portends a drinking window that should rival the ...  legendary 1945. I beg to differ with those that think this is already at maturity today. Not even close! With at least six hours in decanter I'd probably have gone up another couple of points as I bet some of the spirit on the finish would have shown greater integration (and length), 95+;  Parker, 1989:  This house must certainly be the Latour of Portugal. ... Of all the vintage ports, those of Taylor need the longest time to mature and even when fully mature seem to have an inner strength and firmness that keep them going for decades. ... The 1977 has consistently been at the top of my list of vintage ports in this great vintage, although the Dow, Graham, and Fonseca are equally splendid. It is a mammoth, opaque, statuesque vintage port of remarkable depth and power, but it should not be touched before 2000, 96;  www.taylor.pt ]
Glowing garnet and ruby,  with the Graham’s the oldest of the 1977s,  the second-lightest wine.  On the night the bouquet was restrained to a degree,  at the later discussion stage five people (out of 24) thinking it showed just a trace of TCA / scalping.  The next day the wine had blossomed,  showing an almost browning cassis aromatic quality,  with clear reminders of a high cabernet and cedar Bordeaux wine such as Grand-Puy-Lacoste,  plus hints of currants and nougat.  But it was on the palate that this wine came into its own,  there being a fine-grain almost ethereal quality to the texture and flavour,  wonderfully subtle yet not weak,  long and very beautiful,  again with fine claret reminders.  Being lighter and drier in one sense,  it was perhaps out-gunned by the sweeter wines,  with one-only first place vote,  and one second.  GK 05/18

1977  Graham’s Vintage Port   18 ½ +  ()
Douro,  Portugal:  20.7%;  $255   [ cork,  38mm and 40mm (two half bottles);  original price $26 (750 ml);  cepage tending to 40% touriga nacional, 30% touriga franca,  the balance traditional varieties;  Berry Bros & Rudd:  Graham is renowned for producing one of the most dense and sweet styles of vintage port ... 1977 offers an impressive bouquet of fragrances reminiscent of liquorice, plums, dried fig, followed on the palate by spice and mocha chocolate notes underlying the powerful, concentrated fruit cake flavours;  Robinson,  2004:  Thick, sweet and concentrated. Round and full and unctuous. Lots of macerated prunes and confidence. Lively and dense with real richness but a correct structure. Some floral notes and some dry tannins on the finish. Not quite married but a definite tea flavour. Dry finish, 17.5,  noting that she recently scored the Graham's 1948 and 1945 both at 20;  Parker:  Along with Taylor and Fonseca, Graham has probably been the most consistent producer of great port in the post-World War II era;  James Suckling @ Wine Spectator,  2008:  Aromas of milk chocolate, plum, mint and violet. Full-bodied, with medium sweetness and lots of berry and cherry fruit. Very fruity and fresh. Long and lively. Delicious now, but will improve. Drink now through 2018, 91;  www.grahams-port.com ]
Glowing garnet and ruby,  with the Taylor’s the oldest of the 1977s,  the third to lightest wine.  There is something slightly different about the bouquet of the Grahams.  It is still wonderfully fragrant and true to style,  but all just a little more autumnal,  with more obvious sultana / almost the tang of raisins / glacé fig qualities,  rather than the hints of red fruits in some of the others.  Palate is astonishingly concentrated,  richer and sweeter than the other Portuguese wines,  yet showing attractive integration with the oak.  There is not quite the piquant / enticing quality (and delicacy) some of the wines show,  instead a little cooked prune and a hint of caramel maybe,  but the Graham’s concentration and length of finish almost makes up for that.  Tasters liked this flavoursome wine,  five rating it their top,  five their second,  a thought of barolo mentioned.  It will cellar for years.  GK 05/18

1977  Croft Vintage Port   18 +  ()
Douro,  Portugal:  20.5%;  $207   [ cork,  46mm;  original price $25.70;  cepage touriga nacional,  touriga franca,  tinta roriz,  tinta barroca,  percentages not given;  Robinson,  2002:  Crimson, healthy colour and autumnal undergrowth perfume. Clean and lively, finely etched. Good mid-palate fruit still. Refreshing. Drier than most. Quite long but with no tannin evidence, 17,  Parker,  1989:  Croft never seems to get much publicity since the wines, while always very good, sometimes even excellent, never quite reach the superb level of the top houses in Oporto. … Both the 1975 and 1977 are rich, creamy, intense ports that should be fully mature within 10-12 years, relatively soon for a port, 88;  www.croftport.com ]
Glowing garnet and ruby,  just below midway in depth.  Bouquet does not quite have the red fruits character of the most highly rated wines,  but it is still attractively fragrant,  with thoughts of dried peaches as well as sultanas and browning red fruits,  plus a hint of cinnamon and oak,  even a little nougat and maybe caramel.   Palate is a little older too,  the sultana suggestions darkening to currants and even raisins / cooked prunes,   the oak not quite as integrated,  but the total flavour long.  Two people rated this their top wine,  and eight their second-favourite,  a result I would not have anticipated.  Though not a big wine,  nonetheless it shows the strength of the 1977 port vintage.  GK 05/18

1977  Warre’s Vintage Port   18  ()
Douro,  Portugal:   – %;  $227   [ cork,  50mm;  no info on cepage;  Warre’s is said to be the first British port company to establish in Portugal;  Chris Kissack,  2012:  The 1977 Warre's Vintage Port has a lovely vibrancy ... only showing its age with the suggestion that it is fading to a red translucency rather than any deepening or browning of the colour. The nose is vibrant and fresh, showing smoky fruits  ... Later it shows a brighter character, with tinges of raspberry, smoke, bay leaf and black liquorice. There are also little touches of raisin, but this is faint and not suggestive of over-ripeness, with mature leather and clove tones. ... The palate sweet and rounded, remaining full and softly textured into the middle, with increasing spice and pepper through the midpalate, and there is still a firm seam of acid and alcohol backbone through the middle. With more exposure to the air the alcohol does become somewhat more prominent ... 16.5;  Parker,  1989:  This house makes rather restrained yet rich, flavorful vintage port … [which] … seem slow to develop, and while they never quite have the voluptuous richness of a Dow, Graham, or Fonseca, they have a unique mineral-scented character that gives them their own complexity and style. The 1977 is quite powerful, very deep and intense, particularly for Warre, 92;  www.warre.com ]
Glowing ruby and garnet,  the second-deepest wine.  Bouquet is fragrant and rich on this wine,  more lively than the Croft,  both browning red fruits and sultanas / dried peaches,  plus thoughts of glacé figs and cooked prunes again,  and subtle oak.  The palate however is not quite as promising,  good richness,  length and flavour initially,  but then an intrusive tannic quality to the late flavour,  making the wine seem a little clumsy (relative to the top wines) and one-dimensional.  With food you would not notice this factor at all.  The colour suggests the wine has plenty of time ahead of it,  and there is good fruit flavour,  so the tannic quality noticeable now may well condense / fall out with more time in cellar.  One person had this as their second-favourite wine.  GK 05/18

1975  Delaforce Finest Vintage Port   17 ½  ()
Douro,  Portugal:  20%;  $153   [ cork,  50mm;  original price $16.75;  cepage comments on the website are merely:  Old Vines Field Blend;  Delaforce was in a low phase in the ‘70s, the wines not well regarded;  Broadbent,  2002,  on the vintage as a whole:  A modest vintage, with much to be modest about. An aberration declared by 17 major shippers … the wines are flavoury and quite attractive but have no future. Drink soon.  For our wine,  he comments:  Deep, rich though raw in October 1977. Pale, lean and raisiny in 1989, **  Drink up;  Parker,  1989:  This house tends to make a good port and sell it at rather reasonable prices. The 1975 is straight-forward and chunky, with good length but not much complexity. It is fully mature, 82;  website fiddly to use;  www.delaforce.pt ]
Glowing rosy ruby and garnet,  the lightest wine.  Bouquet is piquant and fragrant,  the orange oil analogy again,  the same kind of enticing quality certain Italian reds including good (traditional) chianti show,  browning red fruits,  a thought of hazelnuts and marzipan,  as well as lightest oak.  In mouth the wine is much lighter than the 1977s and 1963s,  yet there is a harmony and completeness to its lighter presentation which is delightful.  The aromatic fruit and hint of marzipan is in perfect balance to the oak,  with a surprisingly long balanced finish quite belying its size.  One taster produced a neat turn of phrase to sum up this wine:  … enjoyable wine … unencumbered by complexity.  Two people had the Delaforce as their second-favourite,  for the evening.  GK 05/18

1972  Stonyfell Metala Vintage Port   14 ½  ()
Langhorne Creek,  South Australia,  Australia:   – %;  $47   [ cork,  46mm;  original price $5.80,  so a serious wine in its day;  auction price shown the average of two offerings in Australia,  not on wine-searcher;  CS and shiraz;  matured in 500s for 24 months;  Len Evans,  1978:  It is a big, blackberry style of wine with deep almost purple-hued colour and intense fruit flavour.  The wine shows considerable sweetness on the palate, and drinks very well.  It will undoubtedly mellow into a very rich, attractive fortified style given a further five to ten years in bottle;  no recent assessments are available on the Net;  the present-day website does not illuminate former wines;  www.stonyfellwines.com.au ]
Dense brown more than garnet,  but a flush of garnet is just detectable,  eight times the density of the Portuguese wines.  Bouquet is clean and sound,  but totally lacking any of the piquant,  enticing,  aromatic and fresh uplifting qualities of the better wines.  Instead it smells of baked caramel,  coffee-grounds,  licorice,  treacle and date pudding,  on rich cooked-prunes fruit.  Palate is likewise thick and sweet,  raisins and licorice,  caramel and cooked prunes (particularly to the aftertaste),  with American oak being commented on.  The whole wine is rich and perfectly wholesome in a tanniny way,  showing little sign of age or decay,  but it is just irredeemably hot-climate,  thick and dull,  sating the palate.  Two tasters rated it their top wine.  This was the only wine to have a clear ‘least’ vote.  GK 05/18